Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '20 at 16:44
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$304
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 72.8
1-Core 164
2-Core 318
97% 185 Pts
4-Core 619
8-Core 1,120
104% 869 Pts
64-Core 1,489
92% 1,489 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 210
Parallax 266
187% 235 fps
MRender 271
Gravity 232
Splatting 175
180% 226 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 168%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Orico N300 1TB
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 399 409 415 415 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 501
Write 388
Mixed 394
SusWrite 402
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 25.6
122% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 35.1
60% 114 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB-$94
370GB free
Firmware: X41100WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 439
Write 313
Mixed 166
67% 306 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 37.1
142% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 170
130% 179 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 107%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 120 120 119 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 131
Write 123
Mixed 82.4
SusWrite 119
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 97%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 141
Write 145
Mixed 56.3
139% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.9% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 28.4
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 30.9
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $766
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback