Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160316
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '20 at 13:05
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 58.4 1-Core 93.5 2-Core 182 61% 111 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 479 49% 395 Pts	64-Core 507 31% 507 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 80%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.4% Below average	Lighting 38.6 Reflection 35.3 Parallax 50.4 32% 41.4 fps	MRender 52.3 Gravity 49.5 Splatting 38.2 37% 46.7 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 36%
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	5.5% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 6.9 Parallax 6.1 5% 6.47 fps	MRender 7.3 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 8.7 6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.5% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
FM-25S2S-120GBP1 120GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 112GB free Firmware: 30CA13F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 87 84 87 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 142 Write 105 Mixed 118 SusWrite 81.8 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 23.2 85% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 102 82% 116 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 151 153 101 131 113 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 150 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 130 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.1 91% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-065.A00G 2x16GB 428 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 12.9 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 9.2 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,493 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	733x
Core i3-7100Intel $38Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	486x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	307x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	459x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	399x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	256x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	269x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	132x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	122x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	131x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293