Lenovo 80E5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80E5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G50-80
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín, 1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150326
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateDec 18 '20 at 09:39
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 44%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 124
56% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 186
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 390C) 1GB
CLim: 750 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 4.8
3% 3.57 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 3.2
3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2201000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 114 137 114 164 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 431
Write 162
Mixed 180
SusWrite 138
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 11.3
73% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 76.7
83% 138 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 71%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
379GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 69 76 73 77 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 75.5
Write 55.7
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 72.5
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
154% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 59%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
267GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 24 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 25.2
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 21.6
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 42%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB
609GB free, PID 6125
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 128 107 148 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 129
Write 107
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 126
146% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.5% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 6.9
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E5 Builds (Compare 1,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback