ADD TO PC
BUILD

AMI Aptio CRB

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	AMI Aptio CRB (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 16 '17 at 21:25
Run Duration	411 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom E3845 6 User benchmarks, average bench 32% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Memory 55.3 1-Core 18.1 2-Core 34.9 26% 36.1 Pts	4-Core 72.1 8-Core 71.9 10% 72 Pts	64-Core 71 4% 71 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 0F31) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.95 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.57 1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk i110 128GB 238 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: i221000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 20 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 79 (A5) Unknown 100 100 1740 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 118 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 42 201864577066 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1 (F1) Unknown 100 100 72936720 (F2) Unknown 100 100 51677269	35.1% Below average	Read 246 Write 218 Mixed 186 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 6.51 37% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 35 DQ Write 15.2 DQ Mixed 6.27 10% 18.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 45%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 6GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 36.4 Write 9.04 Mixed 13.2 20% 19.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.07 4K Write 2.63 4K Mixed 1.51 160% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 35%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB 1,935 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 5GB free, PID c75c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	5.19% Terrible	Read 20.4 Write 4.55 Mixed 6.19 10% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.21 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.003 20% 1.74 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.19% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 1x8GB 907 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.9% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 7.2 22% 7.53 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Aptio CRB Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: AMI Aptio CRB

CPU
Celeron J1900IntelBench 36%, 507 samples	24x
Celeron J1900IntelBench 34%, 6,116 samples	22x
Celeron N2930IntelBench 34%, 2,000 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	64x
Atom Processor E3800 Series/Celeron Processor N2920/J1900IntelBench 1%, 300 samples	3x

SSD
SSD 64GBBench 53%, 250 samples	4x
SSD 64GBHoodiskBench 63%, 57 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	8x
1x4GBAdataBench 31%, 5,816 samples	4x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback