Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 101% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA550
Memory	24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200916
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '20 at 04:49
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Memory 83.8 1-Core 141 2-Core 272 91% 165 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 755 78% 631 Pts	64-Core 900 56% 900 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 200C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.03% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 9.8 Parallax 8.4 5% 8.07 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 11.4 8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.03% Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 2486) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	125% Outstanding	Lighting 174 Reflection 164 Parallax 167 142% 169 fps	MRender 160 Gravity 136 Splatting 117 110% 138 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 223GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 709 607 593 551 541 533 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	249% Outstanding	Read 2,093 Write 1,839 Mixed 1,340 SusWrite 589 327% 1,465 MB/s	4K Read 60.9 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 79.9 264% 90.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,176 DQ Write 944 DQ Mixed 1,062 794% 1,061 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 249% Great: 296%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 737GB free Firmware: P3CR021 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1442 1456 1483 1480 1483 1483 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	279% Outstanding	Read 1616 Write 1,482 Mixed 1,158 SusWrite 1471 322% 1,432 MB/s	4K Read 62.9 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 81.4 279% 98.1 MB/s	DQ Read 925 DQ Write 772 DQ Mixed 311 380% 669 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 279% Great: 295%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB 20,439 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 26.8 90% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 36.7 SC Mixed 26.7 77% 26.9 GB/s	Latency 73.9 54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	2,026x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	849x
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 79%, 8,783 samples	564x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	490x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	425x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	410x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	165x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	1,058x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	255x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	223x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16