Dell Latitude E6520

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E6520  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0NVF5K
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 18 '20 at 02:00
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 142
59% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 201
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Dell(1028 0494) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 189 7.4 184 252 7.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 446
Write 361
Mixed 343
SusWrite 178
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 18
94% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 37.5
96% 199 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 92%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400 2.5" 320GB-$35
89GB free
Firmware: 0003DEM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 57 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 63.2
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 58
41% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160BJ.C8F Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6520 Builds (Compare 1,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6520

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $62
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback