Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 20:03
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 85.7
1-Core 154
2-Core 308
98% 183 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 1,187
106% 898 Pts
64-Core 2,171
134% 2,171 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
PowerColor(148C 2406) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 249
Parallax 456
187% 312 fps
MRender 367
Gravity 156
Splatting 264
213% 262 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 177%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 319 321 322 323 323 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 312
Mixed 294
SusWrite 321
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 35.7
147% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 204
172% 250 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 126%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
40GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 185 83 82 434 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 111
Mixed 408
SusWrite 240
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 47.6
163% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 199
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 121%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
130GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 436 437 437 442 438 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 431
Mixed 426
SusWrite 438
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 50.5
166% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 184
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
82GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 231 231 234 234 230 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 403
Mixed 330
SusWrite 256
83% 373 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 53.4
180% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
34GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 145 145 145 145 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 450
Mixed 368
SusWrite 171
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 49.8
174% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 135
119% 179 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$32
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 34.4
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 33.9
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,452
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback