Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 15:21
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 304
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 1,129
101% 854 Pts
64-Core 2,100
130% 2,100 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 323 324 324 324 324 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 312
Mixed 317
SusWrite 323
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 41
155% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 214
177% 254 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 126%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
40GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 463 463 463 435 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 86.7
Mixed 248
SusWrite 395
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 46.8
150% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 199
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 121%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
62GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 442 443 442 442 439 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 433
Mixed 423
SusWrite 442
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 48.9
166% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 183
142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
82GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 231 231 232 229 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 397
Write 367
Mixed 251
SusWrite 250
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 27.8
114% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 114%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
34GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 145 144 144 144 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 453
Mixed 304
SusWrite 171
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 49.9
175% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 134
119% 179 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$32
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 35.4
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 34.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,452
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback