Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X530FN
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 17:41
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 222
70% 130 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 603
58% 480 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1C0E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 18.4
Parallax 7.9
6% 11 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 7
Splatting 10.8
7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WSD2280SA256 256GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0813A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 358 56 272 11 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 320
Write 361
Mixed 306
SusWrite 181
66% 292 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 23
104% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 0.5
63% 148 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 90%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
347GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 60 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 144
Write 145
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 61.6
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.6
221% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 04CB AO1P24HC4R1-BUYS 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 21.9
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 22.4
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN Builds (Compare 325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X530FN_S530FN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback