HP p7-1010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p7-1010  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory10 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110504
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 00:25
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 645
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.5% Poor
Memory 26.4
1-Core 11.6
2-Core 41.6
16% 26.5 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 172
24% 175 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
PwrHis(1787 2309) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 6.9
6% 6.8 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 5.6
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 109 111 110 111 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.8% Below average
Read 154
Write 106
Mixed 157
SusWrite 110
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 13.5
45% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 88.5
73% 103 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 100%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
807GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 109 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 63.7
Write 66.2
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 110
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-034.A00LF Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 9905403-447.A00LF 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
23.3% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 4.3
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 277
14% 277 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1010 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback