MSI H97M-G43(MS-7924)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7924
MotherboardMSI H97M-G43(MS-7924)  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 16 '20 at 19:10
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 178
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 397
52% 390 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.1% Above average
Lighting 71.5
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 67.6
58% 70.8 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 65.1
55% 67.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 130 128 124 120 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 354
Write 158
Mixed 209
SusWrite 124
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 99.7
4K Mixed 32.9
142% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 173
128% 170 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 88%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
296GB free
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 378 382 276 276 278 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 400
Write 433
Mixed 382
SusWrite 310
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 38.4
132% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 345
259% 345 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 104%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
123GB free
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 377 405 411 421 420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 416
Mixed 359
SusWrite 384
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 40.8
138% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 346
258% 343 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
194GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 143 145 145 147 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 75
SusWrite 144
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX3M2A1600C11 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMV8GX3M2A1600C11 0215 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.5% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 18
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 19.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-G43(MS-7924) Builds (Compare 545 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI H97M-G43(MS-7924) - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $598
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback