Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 169%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '20 at 18:39
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 255
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 755
78% 631 Pts
64-Core 752
46% 752 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Palit(1569 2206) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 264
Reflection 245
Parallax 272
215% 260 fps
MRender 311
Gravity 226
Splatting 167
184% 235 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 184%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 454 467 436 450 432 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 164
Write 106
Mixed 89.1
SusWrite 450
46% 202 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 44.3
109% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 210
182% 267 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 29.5
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 29.1
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback