| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Boot Drive | 60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A75 Pro4+ (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140805 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 15 '17 at 18:56 |
| Run Duration | 95 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
|
57.9%
Above average
|
57% 93.3 Pts
|
27% 201 Pts
|
13% 207 Pts
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.2%
Poor
|
21% 7.37 GB/s
|
23% 7.93 GB/s
|
52% 77.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A75 Pro4+ Builds (Compare 25 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4+
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 11x |
| A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples | 5x |
| A6-6400K APUAMD $81Bench 40%, 13,306 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples | 4x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 3x |
| HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 24% - Poor | Total price: $588 |