HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2281
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181109
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateDec 15 '20 at 19:02
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 32.6
2-Core 59.5
32% 48.7 Pts
4-Core 88.2
8-Core 90.9
12% 89.6 Pts
64-Core 88.6
6% 88.6 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2281) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4279
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.54% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 4.9
2% 6 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.54%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 500GB-$60
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0704A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 319 361 349 92 8.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 387
Write 13.7
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 222
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 14.7
75% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 86.4
DQ Mixed 0.8
42% 105 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
546GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 97 97 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 62.4
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 95
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3S1600M/8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 15
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 10
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 4,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback