Asrock Z370 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Killer SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 15 '20 at 18:40
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 63.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 382
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
ASRock(1849 3E91) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 5.5
5% 5.1 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$59
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 67 117 122 94 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48% Average
Read 427
Write 362
Mixed 310
SusWrite 110
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 11.2
68% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 35
44% 78.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
250GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 58 56 59 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 66.8
Write 58.5
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 57.9
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 1,166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Killer SLI/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $847
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback