Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '20 at 15:36
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 30.5
2-Core 43.3
32% 45.2 Pts
4-Core 60.5
8-Core 69.8
8% 65.2 Pts
64-Core 70.1
4% 70.1 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 23.9
18% 21.7 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 17.5
18% 22.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 211 135 68 64 66 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29% Poor
Read 151
Write 108
Mixed 109
SusWrite 122
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 12.9
47% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 30.5
DQ Mixed 21.3
17% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 29%
Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
767GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 65 72 79 77 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 51
Write 73.5
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 74.7
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
53% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
27.8% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 11.5
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-HD2 Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-HD2 - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback