Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	21.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	16.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '20 at 09:18
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3355 6 User benchmarks, average bench 13% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Memory 19.3 1-Core 41.8 2-Core 84.1 25% 48.4 Pts	4-Core 84.1 8-Core 83.2 11% 83.6 Pts	64-Core 83.3 5% 83.3 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 54GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 120 120 109 106 97 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.4% Poor	Read 219 Write 144 Mixed 102 SusWrite 110 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 9.7 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 0.4 20% 6.53 MB/s	DQ Read 12.8 DQ Write 12.4 DQ Mixed 6 6% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x6GB 694 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1 of 1 slots used 6GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 5.2 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.33 GB/s	Latency 325 12% 325 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16