ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P9X79-E WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79-E WS (all builds)
Memory	59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150508
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '15 at 13:40
Run Duration	299 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3970X-$217 2,677 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 102 2-Core 204 70% 153 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 660 64% 524 Pts	64-Core 886 55% 886 Pts
Poor: 69% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 3604) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5560 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	48.5% Average	Lighting 61.5 Reflection 52.9 Parallax 67.7 50% 60.7 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 48.2 Splatting 50.7 45% 56.2 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 137GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 460 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 389 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 57 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 57 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1231521552	86.4% Excellent	Read 512 Write 356 Mixed 334 89% 401 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 67.1 4K Mixed 23.1 129% 44.2 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 68.7 71% 116 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 118%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 112 51183185 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 109487306311205 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1213 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 545 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 51183185 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 51183185 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 51183185 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3421 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3101 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3101 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4552	64.3% Good	Read 471 Write 132 Mixed 181 57% 261 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 93.5 4K Mixed 15.6 107% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 31 54% 106 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 82%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$90 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.0 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 117 Write 120 Mixed 114 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 2.54 4K Mixed 0.28 114% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 525GB free Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 167 164 6625 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 946 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 980 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 878 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 723 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8189 (C2) HDA temperature 118 109 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.6% Above average	Read 96.3 Write 86.8 Mixed 71.5 64% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.19 72% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 67%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 282GB free Firmware: 02.03E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 133 132 4325 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2481 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3100 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2333 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 352 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2481 (C2) HDA temperature 109 99 34 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 96 96 3029 (F1) Unknown 200 200 8376155826 (F2) Unknown 200 200 12405405996	57.6% Above average	Read 106 Write 94.8 Mixed 75.3 69% 91.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.38 108% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 60%
Marvell Raid VD 320GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 197GB free Firmware: MV.R Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 96.5 Write 53.9 Mixed 58.2 52% 69.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.25 75% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 127%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95 28,095 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 41GB free Firmware: 01.0 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	38% Below average	Read 60 Write 72 Mixed 72.7 52% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.33 96% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical P9X79-E WS Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 70%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus P9X79-E WS - $499

CPU
Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	47x
Xeon E5-2697 v2IntelBench 69%, 1,265 samples	19x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	10x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	10x

SSD
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $195Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	8x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 2,895 samples	7x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 8x8GBKingstonBench 102%, 125 samples	7x
RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C9 8x4GBG.SKILLBench 111%, 392 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $989

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback