Gigabyte GA-MA790XT-UD4P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA790XT-UD4P  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '20 at 04:47
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 620
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 99
44% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 196
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 367C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63.9% Good
Lighting 80.8
Reflection 86.6
Parallax 76.5
66% 81.3 fps
MRender 79
Gravity 75.8
Splatting 67.9
60% 74.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 123 142 156 158 150 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.7% Good
Read 246
Write 110
Mixed 181
SusWrite 150
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 46
150% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 10.7
26% 57.9 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 178 182 185 184 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 146
Mixed 77
SusWrite 182
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 13.9
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 10.5
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA790XT-UD4P Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790XT-UD4P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback