Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateSep 04 '15 at 06:52
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
84% 186 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 701
72% 582 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 67% Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 480-$500
Asus(1043 8349) 1.5GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5582
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 37.1
Parallax 26.5
19% 29.1 fps
MRender 29.3
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 27.6
21% 25.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SiImage 220GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 505
Write 93.8
Mixed 117
51% 238 MB/s
4K Read 6.24
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 6.39
40% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 0.03
DQ Write 50.6
DQ Mixed 4.78
10% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
2TB free
Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 139
Write 137
Mixed 114
97% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.75
128% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
2TB free
Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70% Good
Read 122
Write 122
Mixed 121
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.67
124% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70%
Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 108
Write 91.7
Mixed 88.1
72% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.18
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
190GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 70.9
Write 72.3
Mixed 75.2
55% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.21
73% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 67%
Typical Z97-PRO(Wi-Fi ac) Builds (Compare 990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO (Wi-Fi ac)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $688
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback