Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime10 Days
Run DateDec 14 '20 at 00:24
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 207
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 592
58% 478 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen07sm20ar256itnvme 256GB 256GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1596
Write 885
Mixed 762
238% 1,081 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 25.1
156% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 767
DQ Write 728
DQ Mixed 471
430% 655 MB/s
Poor: 139% Great: 198%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
56GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 77 86 103 96 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 73.7
Write 88.2
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 93.4
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.5
151% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 12GB
3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 20
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 18.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback