Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD7

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD7 (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '17 at 10:46
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 95.4 1-Core 83.4 2-Core 166 70% 115 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 420 48% 374 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300 14,988 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 1618) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.16% Terrible	Lighting 1.53 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.77 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.43 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.16% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 Pro 128GB-$76 223 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: JURA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 285 Write 156 Mixed 190 46% 210 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 16.3 66% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 15.2 DQ Write 44.5 DQ Mixed 14.9 16% 24.9 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 564GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 42225318 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2411 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 348266128 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 16551 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2449 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 93 93 7 (BE) vendor-specific 69 51 522059807 (C2) HDA temperature 31 49 34359738399 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 49 24 42225318 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 129841156348319 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3908629536 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4001408760	62.2% Good	Read 110 Write 107 Mixed 48.1 65% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 0.88 4K Mixed 0.35 83% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 13.1 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 10.6 SC Mixed 12.3 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 55.9 72% 55.9 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55A-UD7 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD7

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	4x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	2x
Core i7 K 875Intel $180Bench 70%, 2,354 samples	1x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	3x
HD 5750AMDBench 8%, 12,403 samples	1x
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	1x
470 Series SSD 256GBSamsungBench 43%, 462 samples	1x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	3x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	2x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $332

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16