Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 15:03
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 123
53% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 528
50% 413 Pts
64-Core 794
49% 794 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.9% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 65.2
56% 68.9 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 65.6
55% 67.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 105 72 52 98 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 395
Write 332
Mixed 109
SusWrite 106
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 13
54% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 24.7
DQ Mixed 16.4
24% 48.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4A 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback