Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 975-$550 3,143 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 64.7 1-Core 79.6 2-Core 130 54% 91.4 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 324 36% 284 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.43% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 4.2 3% 4.13 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 4 Splatting 5 4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.43% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 196 188 192 195 193 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.5% Good	Read 255 Write 242 Mixed 233 SusWrite 197 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 28.1 107% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 198 148% 196 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-010.A00LF MXIC 25L8005 37GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 33 MHz 4096, 33792 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 5.7 18% 6.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 4.9 13% 4.53 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 37%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
MXIC 25L8005 41GBUnknownBench 36%, 466 samples	193x
MXIC 25L8005 37GBUnknownBench 37%, 309 samples	88x
25L8005 1x33GBMXICBench 23%, 218 samples	55x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16