Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H11DSi
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 09:21
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7301 16-Core
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 71.5
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 166
61% 107 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 555
52% 432 Pts
64-Core 3,593
222% 3,593 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 27.4
16% 24.6 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 21.6
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 627 326 324 321 324 319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1353
Write 1,166
Mixed 1090
SusWrite 374
223% 996 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 53.7
179% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 333
250% 336 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 148%
Great: 302%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
43GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 263 99 105 100 190 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 352
Write 129
Mixed 285
SusWrite 192
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 26.9
97% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 190
144% 193 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
250GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 357 102 104 103 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 387
Write 350
Mixed 327
SusWrite 194
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 27.3
94% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 192
144% 193 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 102%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
103GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 136 135 135 133 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 280
Write 402
Mixed 265
SusWrite 167
63% 278 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 31
106% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 143
126% 188 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 108%
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
142GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 226 230 225 223 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52% Above average
Read 140
Write 266
Mixed 278
SusWrite 228
52% 228 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 20.7
75% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 140
125% 189 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 52%
Great: 91%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
320GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 334 103 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 323
Write 136
Mixed 337
SusWrite 185
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 27.1
95% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 185
139% 185 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK 2x31.5GB
2 of 16 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.5% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback