Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H55M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100212
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateMay 13 '17 at 15:33
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 530-$45
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 123
52% 86.1 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 170
20% 158 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.05 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 2.04
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
578GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49% Average
Read 84.8
Write 86.3
Mixed 78.8
63% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.55
4K Mixed 0.26
53% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49%
Great: 59%
NORELSYS 1081 16GB
7GB free, PID 1081
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.84% Terrible
Read 26.4
Write 11.2
Mixed 16.7
21% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.02
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.49
61% 1.79 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.84%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
24.7% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H55M-S2H Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $73
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback