Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '20 at 21:39
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 219
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 676
67% 544 Pts
64-Core 905
56% 905 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 157
Parallax 158
129% 158 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
118% 148 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 448 282 246 251 252 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 414
Write 470
Mixed 382
SusWrite 322
90% 397 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 34.3
120% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 322
243% 325 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 98%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 226 220 225 223 225 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
96GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 72 72 72 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 106
Write 95.2
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 71.8
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 87%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 67 65 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 116
Write 121
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 66.3
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M4B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M4B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 25.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 24.3
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback