Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1058 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '20 at 10:48
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 152
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 460
45% 369 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.6% Very good
Lighting 95.1
Reflection 106
Parallax 97.5
78% 99.5 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 95.2
Splatting 96.1
78% 95 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 378 392 415 414 396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 426
Mixed 352
SusWrite 382
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 35.8
120% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 191
150% 209 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90%
Great: 124%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
264GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 247 305 252 282 298 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.1% Average
Read 192
Write 97.3
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 275
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 10.7
44% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 183
109% 110 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 102%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
117GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 293 294 295 295 295 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 432
Mixed 401
SusWrite 296
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 43.9
145% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 143
129% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 124%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 116 127 121 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 95.4
Write 119
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 118
146% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.2
125% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 18.6
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 14.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback