Asus X510UAR

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus X510UAR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X510UAR
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '20 at 10:30
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Memory 88.7 1-Core 105 2-Core 130 68% 108 Pts	4-Core 237 8-Core 292 34% 265 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) 420,154 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1D30) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8477 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	4.39% Terrible	Lighting 4.7 Reflection 6.8 Parallax 6 4% 5.83 fps	MRender 7.6 Gravity 5 Splatting 7.3 6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.39% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 480GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 430 382 413 408 366 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	Read 430 Write 394 Mixed 372 SusWrite 403 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 70 4K Mixed 35.9 136% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 252 206% 295 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB 5,327 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.7% Very good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 22.4 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 29.6 SC Mixed 24.2 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X510UAR Builds (Compare 627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X510UAR

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	516x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	69x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	42x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	626x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	75x
THNSNK128GVN8 128GBToshibaBench 56%, 2,065 samples	70x
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	21x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	203x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	108x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369