Asus X510UAR

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus X510UAR (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X510UAR
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '20 at 08:17
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	5%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 108 2-Core 216 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 600 65% 516 Pts	64-Core 599 37% 599 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) 420,154 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1D30) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8477 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	6.41% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 7.2 Parallax 6.7 6% 6.93 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 11.2 8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.41% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 481GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 448 407 306 299 298 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 442 Write 414 Mixed 398 SusWrite 361 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 69.4 4K Mixed 46.8 152% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 348 264% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 133%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID cb30 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 17 16 17 17 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	7.88% Terrible	Read 22 Write 10.2 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 16.2 16% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.88% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB 5,327 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 22.7 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 29.9 SC Mixed 25.2 69% 24 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X510UAR Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X510UAR

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	515x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	68x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	42x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	624x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	1x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	75x
THNSNK128GVN8 128GBToshibaBench 56%, 2,065 samples	69x
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	21x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	201x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	108x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16