| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q900 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | AOpen D1009 |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111006 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 11 '20 at 07:50 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53.3%
Above average
|
52% 80.5 Pts
|
18% 141 Pts
|
9% 147 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Device(A0A0 0809) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3223
|
0.73%
Terrible
|
0% 1.3 fps
|
2% 2.43 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0Q6E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 108 106 110 110 MB/s
|
59.6%
Above average
|
63% 86.4 MB/s
|
121% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.3 9.5 9.3 9.6 9.4 MB/s
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
13% 11.3 MB/s
|
141% 2.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905428-045.A00L 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
49.2%
Average
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
35% 12.1 GB/s
|
54% 74.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ESPRIMO Q900 Builds (Compare 24 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q900
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples | 11x |
| Core i3-2330MIntel $150Bench 47%, 20,066 samples | 7x |
| Core i3-2310MIntel $80Bench 46%, 25,542 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $69 |