Asrock H97 Anniversary

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H97 Anniversary  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '20 at 05:04
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 192
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 532
53% 433 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.6% Very good
Lighting 97.3
Reflection 105
Parallax 96.7
79% 99.5 fps
MRender 91.6
Gravity 95.4
Splatting 95.3
77% 94.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU655 240GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 177 212 149 227 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 405
Write 360
Mixed 331
SusWrite 185
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 35.7
127% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 202
156% 210 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 102%
Hitachi HUS724040ALA640 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MFAOAA70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 153 155 156 156 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 158
Write 167
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 155
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 97%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
713GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 163 157 162 173 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 109
Write 149
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 165
81% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
377% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79%
Great: 112%
ST5000NM 0024-1HT170 5TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 108 111 112 114 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.1% Good
Read 210
Write 191
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 110
189% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.3
165% 2 MB/s
WDC WD14 0EDFZ-11A0VA0 14TB
10.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 1 0.9 0.8 0.5 1.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 200
Write 199
Mixed 156
SusWrite 1.2
176% 139 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 3.2
346% 6.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 86%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
525GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 108 109 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 172
Write 146
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 109
163% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 73%
TOSHIBA MD05ACA800 8TB
5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.3% Below average
Read 127
Write 108
Mixed 73
SusWrite 1.1
94% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.8
236% 2.93 MB/s
Sony MRW-E90 61GB
56GB free, PID 0bae
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 309
Write 154
Mixed 198
257% 220 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 8.1
534% 8.47 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 1319 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 1319 CL11-11-11 D3-1600 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 Anniversary Builds (Compare 538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Anniversary

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback