Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200527
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 16:39
Run Duration295 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$443
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 272
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 819
80% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,033
64% 1,033 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3716) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 204
Parallax 244
182% 224 fps
MRender 267
Gravity 232
Splatting 160
173% 220 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 164%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
292GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 791 669 667 663 664 663 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,429
Write 2,133
Mixed 1,328
SusWrite 686
366% 1,644 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 73.5
238% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,145
DQ Write 708
DQ Mixed 881
669% 911 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 255%
Great: 340%
Jmicron Generic 1TB
883GB free
Firmware: 0208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 376 375 375 376 376 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 371
Write 374
Mixed 364
SusWrite 376
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 37.1
124% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 160
115% 146 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 86%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
294GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2166 690 628 628 627 628 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,456
Write 2,222
Mixed 1,342
SusWrite 894
386% 1,729 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 76.1
250% 84.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,312
DQ Write 805
DQ Mixed 994
758% 1,037 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 278%
Great: 340%
Asmedia 1053-3G Ext. HDD 500GB
316GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 234 233 228 228 227 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 236
Write 223
Mixed 223
SusWrite 229
311% 228 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 24.1
1,783% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 26.2
DQ Mixed 25.4
1,847% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 169%
Great: 168%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 24.8
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 25.8
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $558
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback