Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 15:36
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 290
92% 169 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 925
89% 732 Pts
64-Core 1,142
71% 1,142 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P620
Nvidia(10DE 1264) 2GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.57
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 20.2
18% 23.5 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 22.2
19% 22.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
2.5" SATA SSD 3TE7 240GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S19C04B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 274 276 274 279 279 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.4% Good
Read 290
Write 141
Mixed 247
SusWrite 276
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 86
4K Mixed 10.8
78% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 168
144% 211 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 78%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 32GB
22GB free, PID 6545,
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
9.59% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 32.2
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 16.2
27% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.59%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M4UI-8GSSKC0K-F 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 28.5
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 28.7
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback