Asrock X570 Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 03:18
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 160
2-Core 319
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 950
98% 792 Pts
64-Core 1,178
73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 94.6
58% 76.9 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 47.7
50% 63.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-ASM2NE6500GTTD 500GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1813 1576 1354 1346 1197 1210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,340
Write 1,894
Mixed 1,999
SusWrite 1,416
429% 1,912 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 236
4K Mixed 90.2
330% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,424
DQ Write 1154
DQ Mixed 1,318
979% 1,299 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 339%
Great: 391%
Kingdian M280 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 308 288 286 284 314 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 290
Mixed 372
SusWrite 314
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 57.9
194% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 123
115% 178 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Gigabyte GP-ASM2NE6500GTTD 500GB
409GB free
Firmware: EGFM13.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2413 2406 2408 2410 2410 2412 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
393% Outstanding
Read 2,146
Write 1,911
Mixed 2027
SusWrite 2,410
479% 2,124 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 230
4K Mixed 90.1
312% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,508
DQ Write 1,352
DQ Mixed 1,482
1,097% 1,448 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 393%
Great: 391%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 43 50 50 52 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C20 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 37
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 33.5
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 33.9
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Steel Legend Builds (Compare 1,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback