PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z170-P (all builds) |
Memory | 14.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151116 |
Uptime | 4.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 09 '20 at 13:20 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 32 30 35 33 31 MB/s
|
76.6%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
337GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 144 144 138 145 147 MB/s
|
84.9%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$61
32GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 164 160 163 164 162 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-2400C15-4GRR F4-2400C15-8GVR F4-2400C15-4GRR 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
|
56.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 1,138x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 923x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 527x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 551x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 535x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 290x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $531 |