Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171114
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 12:43
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$206
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 207
82% 140 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 858
81% 671 Pts
64-Core 1,143
71% 1,143 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 180
Parallax 164
128% 167 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 170
Splatting 118
112% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 538 188 186 186 185 183 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,743
Write 1153
Mixed 484
SusWrite 244
199% 906 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 39.8
197% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 986
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 583
528% 807 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 184%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
524GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 143 142 145 144 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 154
Mixed 86.4
SusWrite 144
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 173 176 176 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 165
Mixed 104
SusWrite 175
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 105%
Great: 109%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 945GB
158GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 47 49 47 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 129
Write 125
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 49.1
69% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.6
294% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 226%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 55GB
9GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 47 49 49 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.5% Average
Read 109
Write 84.5
Mixed 64
SusWrite 48.6
57% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.3
239% 1.8 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.6% Good
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 16.6
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 10.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,739 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback