HP h9-1369eo

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP h9-1369eo (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AD5
Memory	4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120925
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '20 at 11:50
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 79.3 1-Core 101 2-Core 194 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 511 53% 425 Pts	64-Core 509 32% 509 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 100C) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.4% Below average	Lighting 34.8 Reflection 36.3 Parallax 48.2 28% 39.8 fps	MRender 48.5 Gravity 43 Splatting 36.8 34% 42.8 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 309 304 305 308 308 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 144 Mixed 429 SusWrite 301 74% 334 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 38.4 132% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 244 207% 303 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 123GB free Firmware: HP64 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 44 39 45 46 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 17.4 Write 33.4 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 43.1 21% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 Kingston HP655410-150-HYCG M378B5773CH0-CK0 Kingston HP655410-150-HYCG 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 16.9 54% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 17.1 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h9-1369eo Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: HP h9-1369eo

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	2x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	2x

SSD
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	1x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	1x

RAM
8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GBMicronBench 56%, 345 samples	2x
M378B5773CH0-CK0 Kingston HP655410-150-HYCG M378B5773CH0-CK0 Kingston HP655410-150-HYCG 12GBSamsungBench 55%, 6 samples	1x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBCorsairBench 52%, 2,501 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $594

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16