Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory44.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 08:30
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 90.6
91% 90.6 Pts
Poor: 76% Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 146
Parallax 159
127% 153 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 165
Splatting 114
108% 133 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+238G 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 439 473 515 515 539 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 574
Write 297
Mixed 418
SusWrite 486
99% 444 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 33.5
110% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 93.2
DQ Mixed 118
84% 106 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST8000DM002-1YW112 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: DN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 161 156 169 154 168 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 94%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
29GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 108 111 100 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 74
Write 83.9
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 110
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
280GB free
Firmware: AR15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 146 152 150 130 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 85
Write 118
Mixed 62
SusWrite 142
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.7
220% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 87%
H/W DISK 1 8TB
692GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 79 80 74 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 220
Write 205
Mixed 109
SusWrite 77.2
194% 153 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
263% 7.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 79%
H/W DISK 3 1.5TB
992GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 78 79 77 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 84.7
Write 85.2
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 76.6
103% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 44%
H/W DISK 4 8TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 3.5 4.4 2.1 9.1 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.2% Above average
Read 203
Write 186
Mixed 106
SusWrite 10.3
155% 126 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
261% 6.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 3000 C16 Series 48GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 28.6
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 27.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,601 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback