Asus UX305CA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus UX305CA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX305CA
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime24.7 Days
Run DateDec 09 '20 at 08:11
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m3-6Y30
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 37
2-Core 72.2
39% 58.8 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 151
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1CFD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.43 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 4.7
3% 4.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron M600 SATA M.2 256GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MA01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 389
Write 195
Mixed 233
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 12.5
40% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 151
140% 214 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 21.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UX305CA Builds (Compare 150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UX305CA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback