Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte G1.Sniper B5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 11:51
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 214
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 403
54% 406 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6.4
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VGEN08AS18EU240G 240GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2206
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 5.5 23 11 58 22 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 410
Write 258
Mixed 308
SusWrite 22.6
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 24.8
120% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 130
144% 241 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 76%
Sp-5 PRO 512GB
459GB free
Firmware: S1111A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 307 304 310 314 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 338
Write 312
Mixed 300
SusWrite 310
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 18.3
142% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 256
212% 306 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Dark-2400 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF Builds (Compare 763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper B5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback