Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20EQS00J00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20EQS00J00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EQS00J00
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 10:37
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 195
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 502
52% 421 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 222E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4285
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 6.4
5% 6.73 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.4
6% 7.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro M2000M
Legend(17AA 222E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 354.25
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 19.7
17% 19.4 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 16.2
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshib THNSNJ512GDNU A 512GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 130 117 108 123 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 287
Write 166
Mixed 251
SusWrite 131
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 24.4
67% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 29.1
69% 149 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 95%
Toshib THNSNJ512GDNU A 512GB
374GB free
Firmware: JYLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 265 276 254 213 221 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 265
Write 130
Mixed 300
SusWrite 243
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 24.2
73% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 31.1
74% 160 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 23
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 22.1
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback