MSI B360M MORTAR (MS-7B23)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B23
MotherboardMSI B360M MORTAR (MS-7B23)  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 07:35
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 89.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 1,159
102% 866 Pts
64-Core 1,138
70% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 2375) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Lighting 44.7
Reflection 46
Parallax 41.2
36% 44 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 36
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 480 487 488 367 351 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 484
Mixed 408
SusWrite 416
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 57.7
192% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
29GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 299 287 245 223 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 486
Mixed 394
SusWrite 263
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 57.2
190% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 111%
Great: 124%
Phinocom SSD 60GB
25GB free
Firmware: S8FM05.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 99 98 99 99 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.5% Average
Read 467
Write 99
Mixed 129
SusWrite 97.6
43% 198 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 11.2
53% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 37.2
DQ Mixed 35.9
35% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
230GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 135 136 135 136 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 135
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 135
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 22.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 25.5
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M MORTAR (MS-7B23) Builds (Compare 2,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI B360M MORTAR (MS-7B23)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback