Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics187% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '20 at 06:43
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 222
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 726
67% 558 Pts
64-Core 942
58% 942 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Asus(1043 87AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
187% Outstanding
Lighting 273
Reflection 232
Parallax 300
222% 268 fps
MRender 308
Gravity 226
Splatting 165
183% 233 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 187%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 326 325 325 315 259 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 2,143
Write 700
Mixed 1,241
SusWrite 335
243% 1,105 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 73.6
251% 88.5 MB/s
DQ Read 951
DQ Write 919
DQ Mixed 996
731% 955 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 226%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
348GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 461 472 479 477 480 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 208
Mixed 418
SusWrite 470
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 53.8
176% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$84
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 178 179 179 178 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 111
Write 136
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 177
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
68.9% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 21.3
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 20.5
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X CODE Builds (Compare 1,254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $881
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback