Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 07 '20 at 18:50
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$150
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 94.5
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 181
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 506
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
MSI(1462 3289) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.6% Above average
Lighting 70.9
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 65.4
58% 68.3 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 65.6
54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 825 481 471 470 453 467 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,710
Write 1,723
Mixed 1,451
SusWrite 528
303% 1,353 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 49.4
175% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 726
DQ Write 616
DQ Mixed 695
514% 679 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 185%
Great: 284%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
153GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 284 285 285 285 286 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 416
Mixed 371
SusWrite 291
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 48.9
161% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 325
245% 329 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
51GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 352 232 200 177 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 422
Mixed 364
SusWrite 256
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 49.4
161% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 326
246% 329 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 89 90 92 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 82.3
Write 77.3
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 90.1
51% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
642GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 155 152 154 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 169
Mixed 110
SusWrite 153
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 109%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1201
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 113
Write 93.6
Mixed 34
59% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3333 C16 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 33.1
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 25.9
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $840
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback