MSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B17
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17)  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '20 at 23:15
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 268
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 752
80% 641 Pts
64-Core 781
48% 781 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 144
Parallax 146
109% 141 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 140
Splatting 119
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT500P 500GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 606 226 29 55 55 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,378
Write 884
Mixed 837
SusWrite 171
181% 817 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 54.2
195% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 187
154% 227 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 137%
Great: 243%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
298GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 339 350 452 453 435 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 434
Mixed 435
SusWrite 393
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 42.5
141% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 241
181% 249 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99%
Great: 133%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
452GB free
Firmware: P2CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 947 1168 523 421 445 860 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,019
Write 571
Mixed 1140
SusWrite 727
194% 864 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 52.9
166% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,194
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 207
264% 504 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 166%
Great: 253%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
836GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 81 72 91 92 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 49
Write 84.3
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 87.6
51% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 103 91 110 101 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 87.7
Write 105
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 104
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
247% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 89%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB
1TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 114 100 125 127 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 110
Write 114
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 118
147% 108 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.4
241% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 59%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 31.7
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 26.6
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17) Builds (Compare 14,365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $794
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback