Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '20 at 13:34
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 149
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 207
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.00
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36% Below average
Lighting 51.1
Reflection 51.3
Parallax 40.9
42% 47.8 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 29.8
25% 31 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 36%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 120GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSBG200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 61 62 62 60 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 349
Write 180
Mixed 240
SusWrite 67.2
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 28.7
96% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 64.1
DQ Mixed 33.7
29% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 84%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49
448GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 101 137 138 150 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 173
Write 87.2
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 128
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HD5N-CG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback