Asus P8H67-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics43% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '20 at 13:17
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 61.8
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 150
55% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 210
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.00
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43% Average
Lighting 52
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 53.8
42% 53.2 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 52
Splatting 48.7
44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 43%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 120GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSBG200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 60 59 61 62 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48% Average
Read 338
Write 186
Mixed 222
SusWrite 67.1
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 25.5
91% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 72.7
DQ Mixed 41.9
35% 48 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48%
Great: 84%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49
448GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 164 165 165 165 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 144
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 162
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HD5N-CG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M EVO Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback