HP 750-427c

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP 750-427c (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 828A
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180208
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '20 at 22:29
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 207 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 633 61% 503 Pts	64-Core 600 37% 600 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 37D9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.9% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 106 Parallax 109 90% 109 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 99.5 Splatting 93 87% 109 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 431GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 419 425 430 425 439 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 275 Mixed 303 SusWrite 420 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 81.4 4K Mixed 43.1 150% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 285 DQ Mixed 315 238% 321 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 24GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 137 148 143 156 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 137 Write 115 Mixed 81.6 SusWrite 133 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 109%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 71,657 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 810GB free Firmware: SBK2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 105 104 106 103 98 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 55 Write 94 Mixed 56.9 SusWrite 102 57% 77 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.5 163% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GB 6,881 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	69.2% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 20.7 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 20.8 58% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 750-427c Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP 750-427c

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	32x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	3x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x
Blue SA510 2.5 1000GBWDBench 90%, 3,795 samples	3x

RAM
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 67%, 6,881 samples	27x
RMUA5110MB78HAF-2400 2x8GBRamaxelBench 68%, 405 samples	7x
HP24D4U7S8MBP-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 71%, 1,295 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $372

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16