Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X570DD
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '20 at 22:13
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U 78,189 User benchmarks, average bench 48% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Memory 27.9 1-Core 65.1 2-Core 121 38% 71.3 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 395 38% 313 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 1BB1) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.34.06 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.14% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 28.8 Parallax 3.7 2% 11.7 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.14% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 121 143 100 90 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 358 Write 343 Mixed 285 SusWrite 121 62% 277 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 27.5 4K Mixed 19.7 64% 21.1 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 129 103% 146 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PJ8TFK1GM8 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 13.2 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 11.9 26% 9 GB/s	Latency 267 15% 267 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	41x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	23x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 24%, 2,418 samples	18x

SSD
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	3x
GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GBXPGBench 215%, 12,312 samples	2x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	16x
PJ8TFK1GM8 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBUnknownBench 71%, 10 samples	2x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD M471A1K43DB1-CTD 24GBSamsungBench 59%, 25 samples	2x